Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reflects on a past political event, specifically the debate around replacing Joe Biden with Kamala Harris, and comments on the reactions from certain political groups. It appears to be a critique of the political discourse at the time, potentially highlighting perceived inconsistencies or ironies in the arguments made by 'resistance libs.'
- The statement does not directly harm others, but it could be seen as mocking or dismissive of certain political views, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as dismissive of the concerns of those it references.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it seems to mock a political stance rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it appears to mock or belittle a political argument without engaging with it substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or constructive, as it mocks rather than engages. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.