Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a legal clarification regarding a $1 million giveaway by Elon Musk, which is framed as a salary for being a spokesperson for a pro-Trump super PAC rather than a lottery. This touches on public issues related to political funding and transparency.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, as it is a legal clarification.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on legal and procedural aspects rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a legal defense rather than a dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a legal argument rather than a discussion.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to clarify legal aspects of a political funding issue, which can contribute to societal understanding of political processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by clarifying the nature of the giveaway, using the platform to inform the public responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.