Andrew Yang

Rank 15 of 47

Score 117

To Elon’s theory that Dems want to swamp swing states with migrants - 1. It ignores the migrants heading to non-swing states 2. It ignores the fact that these are dynamic systems and that doing this would move voters in those states hard to the right - which is already happening…

11/5/2024, 4:20:17 PM

In reply to:

Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸

@AndrewYang

67d

For the record no matter what happens tonight I think the Kamala Harris campaign badly mishandled the Joe Rogan interview by not doing it. Tim Walz would have been good too.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a political theory related to migration and its impact on swing states, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is analytical, aiming to critique and provide counterpoints to a theory attributed to Elon Musk.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing a theory rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing counterarguments to a theory, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the theory's flaws without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]