Jake Tapper

The statement critiques public memory and perception regarding election forecasts, suggesting a tendency to overlook data in favor of emotional responses. It engages with public discourse by addressing the interpretation of polling data and election outcomes.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of public behavior, which could be seen as dismissive.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It lacks empathy and understanding, as it uses a somewhat sarcastic tone to describe public reactions. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone rather than fostering discussion. [-1]