Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 69
11/7/2024, 6:07:00 AM
X
In reply to:
nikesa
@lilanikesa
·
254d
@awol7589 @marwilliamson we all have our conditioning to shed.
Awol B 🌻🥗☮️
@awol7589
·
255d
@lilanikesa @marwilliamson Agreed bro! I wish Marianne were more nuanced on this subject, I expected her to be less like those pro-Harris syncophantslol
nikesa
@lilanikesa
·
256d
@marwilliamson Abortion is such a tricky topic. When does a person begin being a person?

As it would naturally follow that this person would also have a right to choose.

In some ways, this is an impossible question to answer from a neutral perspective of the physical world, and therefore…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
256d
I care about animals; I care about people even more. Government should not have told that man what to do with his squirrel, and it sure as hell should not be telling women what to do with our bodies.

The statement engages in a public discourse about women's rights and bodily autonomy, specifically in the context of abortion. It challenges the notion of men dictating how women should discuss or handle issues related to their bodies, reflecting a broader societal debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of the men's comments, which could be seen as a defensive stance rather than harmful.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of women by defending their autonomy and does not engage in hate speech or harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the issue of male influence over women's discussions about their bodies. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement could be seen as a personal attack on the men involved, as it questions their authority to comment on women's issues, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]