Andrew Yang

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 109
11/7/2024, 2:52:12 PM
X
In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
70d
I was told by a friend that the Harris campaign had me on a list of people not to use because I had ‘crossed a line’ with my criticism of Joe Biden. I know I wouldn’t have made that big a difference but that’s indicative of a dysfunctional culture.
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
70d
If the job is/was defeating Trump, the Democratic Party is objectively bad at its job.

The statement criticizes Joe Biden and the Democratic Party, suggesting they failed in their responsibilities and protected Biden until it was too late. It engages in public discourse by addressing political accountability and party dynamics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words but implies negligence, which could be seen as harmful to reputations. However, it is a critique of public figures, which is generally acceptable in public discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a political critique rather than a personal attack.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without providing specific evidence or engaging in a constructive discussion. [-1]