Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 68
11/8/2024, 7:40:43 AM
X
In reply to:
Christine Kramar
@ChristineKramar
·
258d
@SohaliV @abreezeclayton @deanbphillips @marwilliamson So when a chair pretends that they are going to be fair and allow “media recognized candidates” as was done in the 2016 & 2020 cycle then doesn’t even excluding @marwilliamson who was on the ballot in 2020 NC then they create an insurmountable disadvantage to the campaigns.
Christine Kramar
@ChristineKramar
·
258d
@SohaliV @abreezeclayton @deanbphillips @marwilliamson Instead she chose to speak to Dean Phillips and NOT disclose that she was NOT allowing others onto the ballot. For campaigns this is crucial because otherwise you have to spend $200k+ on a petition operation that requires 10,000 signatures 3.2x the number of other states.
Christine Kramar
@ChristineKramar
·
258d
@SohaliV @abreezeclayton Absolutely NOT it was her decision NOT to hold a primary in North Carolina. It was her pen that could have added @deanbphillips and @marwilliamson to the ballot but instead did as directed by the DNC. As chair she had options.
Sohali Vaddula
@SohaliV
·
259d
Idk who needs to hear this but @abreezeclayton needs to be elected DNC Chairwoman. The Democratic Party needs new young leadership with real perspectives that aren’t out of touch with reality. The time is now.

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing the fairness and transparency of political processes within the Democratic Party, specifically regarding ballot access in North Carolina. The tone is critical and suggests a lack of responsiveness from party officials, which is a public concern related to democratic processes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but highlights perceived unfairness, which can be seen as a call for accountability.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on procedural issues rather than personal attacks.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the process but does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand.
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss a public issue, aligning with the principle of responsible free speech. [+1]