Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 66
11/8/2024, 8:25:00 AM
X
In reply to:
Natalie
@NatalieFl23
·
260d
@marwilliamson @ErThou @elonmusk He's not one person.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
260d
@NatalieFl23 @ErThou @elonmusk By people being aware -- NOT by one person deciding to override rules and norms in the name of being a tough macho man who's going to "clean house."
Natalie
@NatalieFl23
·
260d
@marwilliamson @ErThou @elonmusk You just posted in your response to Christine Kamar "It’s important for people to know how corrupt the system has become." How do you propose we clean out this vast system: The DNC system, the RNC system, the unelected bureaucrat system, crooked judges.. etc?
Natalie
@NatalieFl23
·
261d
@marwilliamson @ErThou @elonmusk So you believe one man will be doing so and that more than half of the people who voted, voted for Totalitarianism?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
261d
@ErThou @elonmusk It is already structured. The checks and balances in our system are essential to our freedom. Our Founders did not intend for one man to be able to exert total control of all aspects of our government. The American Revolution was fought to reject that, not to reinstate it.
Comey-er Than Thou
@ErThou
·
261d
@marwilliamson @elonmusk Fair, very good question - so how would you structure it, MW?

The statement 'Excuse me. Or a small team.' is part of a broader conversation about governance, checks and balances, and systemic corruption. The tone is corrective, suggesting that the solution to systemic issues may involve a small team rather than a single individual. The intent is to contribute to the discussion on how to address systemic corruption without resorting to authoritarian measures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a mild correction, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a collaborative approach rather than a singular authoritarian one, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by offering an alternative perspective without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]