Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 66
11/8/2024, 8:35:53 AM
X
In reply to:
American Caesar 🇺🇸🌿 Constitutional Nationalist
@CivOptimist
·
262d
@NatalieFl23 @THC_ZAR @marwilliamson Tulsi, RFK, Rogan, and so many other liberals have moved over. We are actually the classical liberal party. As for the abortion issue, we're now more like Europe, with each state getting to choose. Most states are liberal on this front and this will be less divisive over time.
Natalie
@NatalieFl23
·
262d
@THC_ZAR @marwilliamson @CivOptimist Good point!
CZAR
@THC_ZAR
·
262d
@NatalieFl23 @marwilliamson @CivOptimist @marwilliamson you are more like us than you think, you were just trapped by your party
Natalie
@NatalieFl23
·
262d
@THC_ZAR @marwilliamson @CivOptimist The corrupt system you can't believe that went after you Marianne here in America is the beast we are all facing and voted to overhaul.
CZAR
@THC_ZAR
·
262d
@marwilliamson @CivOptimist Marianne, I really do respect you and I would've loved you to run for President.
You have a lot to catch up on, because the DNC paid attention to their tunnel vision views ONLY. Never giving an ounce of attention to the GOP or any other candidate for that matter.
We, the people…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
262d
@CivOptimist Are you sure?

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the comparison of U.S. states' abortion policies to European countries, challenging the notion that most U.S. states are liberal on this issue. It aims to clarify a misconception in the ongoing debate about abortion rights and state autonomy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on correcting a perceived misconception. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It attempts to promote understanding by clarifying differences between U.S. states and European countries regarding abortion policies. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]