In reply to:
Keith Ellison
@keithellison
·
270d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the leadership qualities needed for the Democratic Party and critiquing past decisions, which are public issues. The tone is supportive of Keith Ellison and critical of past leadership decisions, suggesting a desire for genuine change within the party.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions, but it does imply criticism of Tom Perez and the decision-making process, which could be seen as indirectly harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Democratic Party's leadership choices, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to express an opinion on party leadership, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.