Rick Scott
@SenRickScott
·
319d
The statement and conversation involve a political endorsement and discussion about Senate procedures, which constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues related to political leadership and legislative processes.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, but the underlying conversation about recess appointments could have implications for Senate procedures.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily a political endorsement.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a political figure, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society depending on one's political perspective. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.