The statement critiques the current state of generative AI models, suggesting skepticism about their capabilities and understanding. It references Gary Marcus, a known critic of AI, and uses humor to emphasize the point. The linked article supports the critique by discussing the limitations of AI models.
- The statement does not cause harm; it uses humor to critique AI models, which is a common and accepted form of discourse in technology discussions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the limitations of AI models, encouraging readers to consider the implications of deploying such technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the technology itself rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing AI technology, contributing to the public discourse on its limitations. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.