Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement is a strong critique of a proposed bill, suggesting it would lead to censorship and grant excessive power to Donald Trump. It uses charged language, such as 'fascist tools,' to emphasize the perceived threat to free speech and democracy. The intent is to mobilize opposition to the bill by framing it as contradictory to democratic values.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by opposing a bill perceived as harmful to free speech. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language is confrontational and could be seen as a personal attack, reducing constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the bill, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.