Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
11/12/2024, 9:19:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
457d
@DeryaTR_ Sorry I am not going to do business with you again. I will pay what I owe if I lose, but otherwise keep my distance.

It is indeed quite clear that you are not concerned that your sloppy writing let people take unfair cracks at me. I found that irresponsible and unprofessional…
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
459d
@GaryMarcus I offered to double the bet, or we can even raise it 10x if you prefer, yet you refused. I posted screenshots of your exact tweets with dates, so it’s not my concern if some people didn’t understand. And you’ve already pointed this out a million times! If you’re so confident,…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
459d
@DeryaTR_ Derya,
1. with due respect, this is also misleading. I wasn’t mad because you offered a way out, I was mad because you wrote a careless message. I explained in great detail why it was misleading, and pointed to many people who replied who were in fact misled. You refused to…
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
459d
Let me put this here for the record. I’ll repost this in a year when I’ve also won my bet against him on OpenAI’s valuation.😂

Incidentally, he was so upset when I offered him a way out, to admit that he lost—yet here he claims victory based on totally BS fake news! Hilarious🤣

The conversation involves a public disagreement between two individuals over a bet and the interpretation of statements made on social media. The tone is confrontational, with accusations of misrepresentation and unprofessional behavior.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it involves accusations and a confrontational tone, which could escalate tensions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it publicly accuses someone of misrepresentation and unprofessionalism. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it involves personal attacks rather than focusing on resolving the disagreement. [-1]