In reply to:
sebastian barros
@sebastianbarros
·
456d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the progress and limitations of AI technology, specifically addressing claims about AI's development plateauing. The tone is defensive and corrective, aiming to clarify the speaker's previous contributions to the debate.
- The statement does not directly harm but is defensive in nature, aiming to correct perceived misinformation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but includes a personal critique, which could be seen as bordering on disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in a form of personal attack by accusing someone of rewriting history, which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.