Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement critiques Politico's coverage of Pete Hegseth, suggesting it inadvertently builds support for him by quoting a defense industry lobbyist's blunt reaction. The tone is critical of both the media and the defense industry.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses a quote that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of a blunt quote respects the privacy of the lobbyist by maintaining anonymity, but the language could be seen as undignified.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of media practices and defense industry perspectives, but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique media influence and defense industry perspectives, potentially encouraging public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.