Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 55
11/13/2024, 7:18:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Ricki 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈
@stoicismsaves
·
439d
@marwilliamson When it comes to cutting off bureaucratic fat, we did indeed mandate that.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
439d
Let me make it simple for you. This is a complicated, lovely sounding way of saying that whatever Trump and his corporate sponsors want, Vivek and Elon will make sure they get.
Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
·
439d
Here’s a key point about our mission at DOGE: eliminating bureaucratic regulations isn’t a mere policy preference. It’s a legal *mandate* from the U.S. Supreme Court:
- West Virginia v. EPA (2022) held that agencies cannot decide major questions of economic or political…

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about bureaucratic regulations and their implications, referencing a Supreme Court decision. The tone is skeptical, suggesting disagreement with the previous statement's interpretation.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by expressing skepticism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the content of the discussion rather than attacking individuals. [+1]