The statement critiques the Democratic Party's actions during the primary elections and compares them to the current situation with Trump's Cabinet picks. It suggests a perceived inconsistency or hypocrisy in political actions and decisions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to political polarization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a rhetorical question to criticize. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived political inconsistencies, which could be seen as contributing to public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.