Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 18
11/13/2024, 11:30:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Primo Radical
@PrimoRadical
·
414d
@mtaibbi It’s really amazing how your work on the Twitter Files was a watershed moment for discussion around tech censorship.

History will remember the Twitter Files as a key moment in journalistic history.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
414d
There’s been no allegation - not one - that any of the Twitter Files documents were inauthentic. There’d be no reason to suspect this, either, since the company was the source.
🔞 Space-faring, glowing goo
@Coren26994826
·
414d
@DicksonDawg @zorntbh @BerryBlue97 @Nate71820994528 @Mock43754040 @ScottBennett84 @RonFilipkowski @mtaibbi If you had actually STUDIED the words you are using rn, you'd know that primary sources need to be taken together and aren't reliable by themselves

Yk, because a thing called "LYING" Exists, and also a thing called "BEING WRONG" does

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of censorship in the context of an election, which is a significant public concern. The tone is assertive, suggesting that censorship played a major role in the election despite being dismissed by some as a non-issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies a controversial stance on censorship.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a one-sided view on censorship. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing censorship, a relevant public issue. [+1]