In reply to:
Peace and Purpose
@purposeispeace
·
412d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
412d
Bowman Tatrović
@btatrovic86
·
412d
The statement is part of a broader discussion about the transparency and credibility of information related to the 'Twitter Files' and alleged political influence on social media platforms. The tone is skeptical and challenges the credibility of the information presented by Matt Taibbi, suggesting a lack of thorough investigation and potential bias.
- The statement questions the integrity of the information without resorting to harmful language, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the credibility of information rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the thoroughness of the investigation, though it could be more constructive by suggesting ways to improve transparency.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.