Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the current state of AI development, suggesting that expectations for exponential growth have not been met. It references expert opinions and industry challenges, indicating skepticism about the feasibility of achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) soon. The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, focusing on the practical limitations and marketing challenges faced by AI companies.
- The statement does not cause harm but highlights potential overestimations in AI capabilities, encouraging a realistic view. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by discussing the complexities and challenges in AI development, fostering informed discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI companies' strategies without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.