The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of how authorities handle investigations related to significant public figures and events, such as the Kilimnik interview and Julian Assange's involvement in Russiagate. It implies a critique of investigative processes and raises questions about transparency and accountability in public affairs.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a critique of investigative processes rather than individuals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in critique but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions of authorities rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning and critiquing public processes, using the platform to raise awareness about potential issues in public investigations. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.