Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -20
11/14/2024, 2:54:49 AM
X
In reply to:
CBSeymour
@CBSeymour
·
308d
@mtaibbi No U.S. authorities tried to talk to him? Your reporting seems, uh, wrong and/or willfully a lie. But that’s what you’re paid to do, so, bravo Heir Goebbels.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
308d
The Kilimnik interview issue is similar to the way no US authorities attempted to talk to Julian Assange about Russiagate, despite his supposedly prominent role in the story.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the investigation into Russiagate and the involvement of Julian Assange, which are significant public issues. The tone is defensive and suggests a reliance on information from Wikileaks, while also highlighting a lack of comment from authorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to misinformation if not substantiated.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the conversation it is part of includes a derogatory comparison to Goebbels, which is harmful. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but is part of a conversation that includes ad hominem arguments. [-1]