The statement engages in a discussion about the role and integrity of journalism, contrasting traditional journalism with citizen journalism. It suggests that while citizen journalism has a place, traditional journalism should not be entirely replaced, indicating a concern for maintaining journalistic standards and integrity.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not use harmful language and suggests a constructive alternative, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the value of both traditional and citizen journalism, fostering a balanced view.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue by proposing an alternative without attacking others personally, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech by supporting the existence of both traditional and citizen journalism, using the platform responsibly.
[+1]