In reply to:
Redbad
@michaelHoe89274
·
437d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
437d
Warren Gunnels
@GunnelsWarren
·
437d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the influence of money in politics, specifically referencing the Citizens United decision and its impact on political funding from both the right and the left. The tone is critical and seeks to highlight the bipartisan nature of the issue.
- The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes a systemic issue, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the bipartisan nature of the issue, encouraging empathy towards the systemic problem. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political funding system without personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a significant societal issue, aligning with the principle of betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.