Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
11/14/2024, 1:42:33 PM
X
In reply to:
aieconomics
@aiecon23
·
454d
@GaryMarcus @sama
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
454d
OpenAI agents are coming in January
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
454d
So then where is GPT-5, @sama?
Sam Altman
@sama
·
454d
there is no wall

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the reliability and future of AI technology, specifically deep learning and OpenAI's developments. The tone is skeptical and somewhat confrontational, as it challenges the optimism about AI advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is critical but does not appear to cause harm. It questions the reliability of AI, which is a valid concern in technological discourse.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by referencing past predictions and current developments. However, it could be seen as dismissive rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]