In reply to:
🚨 Katherine Brodsky
@mysteriouskat
·
452d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of term limits for political positions, including the Supreme Court, which is a substantive public issue.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy issue, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clearly stating a position on term limits, which can foster dialogue and consideration of different perspectives. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by opposing the idea of fewer term limits without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly expressing an opinion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.