Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
11/15/2024, 1:06:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Dr. Sark Chasm, MD
@bgiromini
·
452d
@GaryMarcus Is this the same science that said the vaccine stopped the spread of Covid?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
452d
Everyone should be terrified.

Not just scientists, but anyone who depends on science and well-trained scientists: tech companies, pharma companies, ordinary citizens, etc.
Andrew Maynard
@2020science
·
452d
Scientists should be shaking in their boots as they anticipate who Trump appoints to head up NSF, NIH, and OSTP ...

The statement engages in a public discourse about the role and reliability of science, particularly in the context of public health and technological advancements. It responds to skepticism about scientific claims by highlighting the positive contributions of science.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and instead highlights the benefits of science, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by reminding others of the positive impacts of science, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a counterpoint to skepticism without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to responsibly defend the value of science, aligning with the principle. [+1]