Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of legislative power and accountability in the U.S. government. The tone is assertive and calls for action, focusing on the role of Congress and the influence of bureaucratic regulations.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does use strong language to criticize a process.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a perceived issue with legislative power but lacks empathy or compassion in its delivery. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Congress and bureaucrats but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a change in legislative processes, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly addressing a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.