Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the efficacy of vaccines and public health policies. It contrasts the perceived exaggeration of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and mandates with the success of the measles vaccine, supported by historical data.
- The statement attempts to do no harm by acknowledging the success of the measles vaccine, promoting its importance in public health. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by distinguishing between different vaccines and their impacts, encouraging a nuanced view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing potential disagreements about vaccine efficacy and mandates without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.