Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a public figure, Mike Johnson, making a request regarding the handling of an ethics report on another public figure, Matt Gaetz. This request touches on issues of transparency, accountability, and the separation of powers within governmental processes, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the request to withhold the report could be seen as potentially harmful to public trust in the ethics process. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects privacy by not disclosing report details.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not promote constructive dialogue or criticism either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The request to withhold the report could be seen as not using influence for the betterment of society, as it may hinder transparency. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement involves a public figure using their platform, but the request could be seen as not upholding the principles of free speech and transparency. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.