Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes CNN host Dana Bash for allegedly being uninformed about Israel's policies and accuses her of being a mouthpiece for genocide in Gaza. It raises a public issue regarding media responsibility and bias, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language, potentially causing harm by accusing Dana Bash of being a mouthpiece for genocide, which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Dana Bash by making a severe accusation without providing evidence, which could be considered a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a personal attack on Dana Bash rather than focusing on the specific issues or policies being discussed, violating the principle of constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement raises a legitimate concern about media responsibility, which aligns with the principle of using free speech responsibly, but the accusatory tone undermines this alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.