Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 16

The statement is a critical commentary on former President Trump's potential cabinet appointments, suggesting they prioritize Israeli interests and are pro-war. It challenges the notion of Trump being anti-war and calls for opposition to a perceived bipartisan support for war and Wall Street interests.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly with the term 'Israel-first warmongers.' [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the language could be interpreted as disrespectful or potentially harmful to certain groups. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive language. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone and does not provide a nuanced argument. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use influence to rally opposition against perceived political issues, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]