The statement 'As we knew it would' is a response to a tweet about the Pentagon failing its audit, which is a public issue concerning government accountability and financial transparency. The tone suggests a sense of expectation or resignation about the outcome, implying criticism of the Pentagon's financial management.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of the Pentagon's financial practices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more of a resigned acknowledgment rather than an attempt to foster dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a brief comment without elaboration or personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a public issue, potentially encouraging scrutiny of government financial practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by commenting on a public issue, but it lacks depth or responsibility in fostering a constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.