Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 53
11/16/2024, 8:02:58 PM
X
In reply to:
Lenny III
@LennyK_III
·
430d
@marwilliamson @middlebanana1 I don’t agree with Huckabee’s claim, but Israel is not the one standing in the way of a 2 state solution. A 2 state solution has been offered and rejected by the Palestinians multiple times.
The Hamas charter states it’s a violation of Islamic law to 1/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
430d
@middlebanana1 Half-true. The point is that the status quo is obviously unsustainable, and a two-state solution is the only solution. Those who say that's impossible are proposing something equally impossible. Neither people deserve all the land; both people deserve their part of it. Arab…
Banana In The Middle
@middlebanana1
·
430d
@marwilliamson Not illegal. Was managed by Jordan. They don’t want it. Israel offered it to the Palestinians three times. They didn’t want it. So Israel administers it legally.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically addressing the obstacles to a two-state solution. It attributes blame to a specific political figure, Bibi Netanyahu, suggesting he has been a significant barrier in recent years.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a political critique rather than personal attacks, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on political actions rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on assigning blame.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by identifying a perceived obstacle in the political process, but it could be seen as a personal attack on Netanyahu, which slightly violates the principle. [-1]