Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 56
11/16/2024, 8:27:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Tree of Life 🇮🇱🇩🇪
@peters_kasimir
·
429d
@marwilliamson @LennyK_III @middlebanana1 2019 and 2008 where the last offers for a 2 state solution both rejected by the Palestinians so do not blame Israel by calling it an occupation. Also giving them a state won't solve their hatred for jews they won't stop until all of Israel is destroyed
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
429d
@LennyK_III @middlebanana1 Yes it's been offered and rejected in the past, but Bibi Netanyahu has been a main obstacle in recent years.
Lenny III
@LennyK_III
·
429d
@marwilliamson @middlebanana1 I don’t agree with Huckabee’s claim, but Israel is not the one standing in the way of a 2 state solution. A 2 state solution has been offered and rejected by the Palestinians multiple times.
The Hamas charter states it’s a violation of Islamic law to 1/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
429d
@middlebanana1 Half-true. The point is that the status quo is obviously unsustainable, and a two-state solution is the only solution. Those who say that's impossible are proposing something equally impossible. Neither people deserve all the land; both people deserve their part of it. Arab…
Banana In The Middle
@middlebanana1
·
429d
@marwilliamson Not illegal. Was managed by Jordan. They don’t want it. Israel offered it to the Palestinians three times. They didn’t want it. So Israel administers it legally.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the complex and ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically focusing on the occupation of the West Bank and the situation in Gaza. It suggests that the current situation will perpetuate animosity towards Israel and advocates for 'Justice for All' as a solution.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite harm but highlights the potential for increased hatred, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. However, it does not explicitly promote harm.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the long-term consequences of the conflict and suggesting justice as a solution, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by responding to previous comments and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By advocating for 'Justice for All,' the statement uses its influence to suggest a path towards societal betterment, aligning with the principle of using influence positively. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a contentious issue and advocating for a peaceful resolution, demonstrating integrity in its approach. [+1]