Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a public figure, Arizona Senator-elect Ruben Gallego, discussing his approach to evaluating a controversial nominee for defense secretary. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue, as it pertains to the responsibilities of a senator and the evaluation of a nominee for a significant government position.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward expression of intent to fulfill constitutional duties. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the nominee's public statements rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by indicating a willingness to give the nominee an opportunity to explain past statements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging the need for the nominee to answer for past statements, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.