Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
11/17/2024, 9:37:23 PM
X
In reply to:
professor mir 🇵🇸 #FreePalestine
@ShabanaMir1
·
425d
@marwilliamson @jonfavs You also had nothing different to offer Palestinians, Marianne.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
426d
@jonfavs That means we would have rejected women’s suffrage as well as the civil rights movement. Great historical change is not always -or even usually - initiated by the majority. It’s often initiated by a small group of people considered outrageous radicals by the status quo of their…
Jon Favreau
@jonfavs
·
426d
Dems should resist any group or special interest that pressures them to take positions opposed by the electoral majority essential to win, whether that’s big corporations, rich donors, nonprofits, whoever.

This isn’t about blaming specific groups for defeat - it’s about what’s…
Mehdi Hasan
@mehdirhasan
·
426d
It’s a great quote, but the piece as a whole jumps on this new bandwagon of blaming ‘groups’ in the Dem coalition for defeat, and implying they control everything, rather than the billionaire class and special interests which have far more control on the modern Democratic Party.

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a political issue concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict, referencing a political candidate's stance. The tone is dismissive, as it simply states 'Not true at all' without further elaboration, and links to a website for more information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as unconstructive.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it lacks explanation or context. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply dismisses the previous comment without elaboration. [-1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech but does not provide a responsible or informative contribution to the discourse.