Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 67
11/18/2024, 6:55:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Chloe
@ChloeKittieKat
·
422d
@marwilliamson @a_cryptofool @alexanichadhain And yet we had 4 years of peace under him. Go figure. Could it be you suffer from confirmation bias? Also you do understand the concept of peace thru strength don't you? Just like a strict parent is able to preemptively stop their kids from creating chaos or hurting each other.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
422d
@a_cryptofool @alexanichadhain From everything he has said so far, I see him as anything but a peacePresident. I know that has been a huge projection onto him, but his policies from what I can see lack any recognition of the basics of peace creation.
A Crypto Fool
@a_cryptofool
·
422d
@marwilliamson @alexanichadhain I’ll say this, if Trump does create a department of peace, and you are his pick to lead this department, I would be heartbroken if you didn’t accept.

You’d probably lose your job very quickly when you remain critical of Trump, but I’d still like you to give it a shot!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
422d
@alexanichadhain Neither.
alexanichadhain
@alexanichadhain
·
422d
@marwilliamson I keep asking this but maybe you are not seeing my comment. If Team Trump invited you to create a Dept of Peace now would you do it? Or would you wait 4 years to see if the Democrats will allow you to primary?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
422d
History is being written as we speak. One of the narratives being promulgated is that the 2024 disaster for Democrats was due to Joe Biden not getting out of the race in January. That is disingenuous. More significant is the fact that none of the status quo Democratic…

The statement critiques the concept of 'peace through strength' by highlighting the dangers and financial implications of maintaining a large nuclear arsenal. It engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of nuclear weapons and their impact on global peace and security.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing a policy rather than individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by challenging the notion of nuclear deterrence and encouraging a reevaluation of what constitutes true strength. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about the implications of nuclear arsenals, aiming for societal betterment. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]