In reply to:
Ken 無/🔄
@Ken67547214
·
419d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
419d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the influence of pharmaceutical advertising on media and public health, a significant societal issue. The tone is defensive and critical, suggesting a personal experience of being 'ambushed' by a media figure, which implies a critique of media practices and pharmaceutical influence.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of media practices, which could be seen as a form of constructive critique.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize media practices and pharmaceutical influence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the issue of pharmaceutical influence on media and public health, though it is framed in a defensive manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of media practices but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss a public issue, aligning with the principle of free speech and responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.