Rashida Tlaib

Rank 6 of 47
|
Score 240

The statement is a call to action regarding a significant public issue, namely the U.S. military aid to Israel and its implications on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It presents a strong opinion on the matter, urging people to support a legislative action to block weapons shipments to Israel.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the use of terms like 'genocide.' This could potentially escalate tensions rather than promote peaceful discourse. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the language used could be perceived as disrespectful to certain groups, potentially violating the dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language without fostering dialogue or understanding between differing perspectives. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging opposing arguments or engaging in a balanced discussion. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to mobilize action on a public issue, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment, though the approach may be divisive. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses a platform to address a public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used could be questioned due to its potentially inflammatory nature.