In reply to:
Chrissy Wall 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@CmmonSnseParty
·
419d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
419d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of Reagan-era deregulation policies on current societal issues, specifically the overmedication of America due to pharmaceutical advertising. The tone is critical and aims to provide historical context to a policy debate.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques a policy, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing historical context, though it could be more empathetic in its delivery. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Reagan's policies without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to contribute to a policy discussion, aligning with responsible use of a platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.