Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 67
11/21/2024, 6:15:43 AM
X
In reply to:
FiddleyFud⚛️🇺🇦🇺🇸
@FiddleyF
·
417d
@RachelBitecofer Someone please send @marwilliamson ten free copies of that book.

If we can't combine a winning message with a winning strategy, then we're f****** lost.

Pie in the sky stuff, doesn't work.

These voters respond to fear.

Give them what they need.
Rachel Bitecofer 🗽🦆
@RachelBitecofer
·
417d
Reading the comments I’m thinking some of you don’t know I wrote a book about this topic and it’s a must read if you want to understand why we always lose. https://www.hitemwhereithurts.co…
Rachel Bitecofer 🗽🦆
@RachelBitecofer
·
417d
Until we learn how to shit on Republicans the way that they shit on us, we’re not winning a governing majority.

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing political strategy and issues such as healthcare, immigration, and climate change. The tone is confrontational and uses strong language, reflecting deep political divisions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and image use derogatory language, which can be harmful and divisive, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of offensive language and personal attacks violates the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead focusing on adversarial tactics. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, violating the principle of constructive dialogue. [-2]