Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 177

The statement indicates a political action taken by the speaker, specifically voting against a bill referred to as the 'Nonprofit Killer.' This suggests engagement with a public issue, likely related to legislation affecting nonprofit organizations. The tone is assertive, and the intent is to inform the public of the speaker's stance and actions regarding this bill.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the use of the term 'Nonprofit Killer' could be seen as inflammatory, potentially inciting fear or misunderstanding.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks explanation or context about the bill's implications. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it include personal attacks. However, it does not invite discussion or provide reasoning for the opposition.
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to inform the public of their voting actions, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by opposing harmful legislation. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political stance, but it could use more context to responsibly inform the public about the issue.