Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 59
11/22/2024, 5:03:08 AM
X
In reply to:
Martha Damsky 🗡🌺⏳✝️🐬🦉
@magnoliamartha
·
407d
@rfk_jr_ftw @marwilliamson It's also really really out of touch to think there aren't American citizens who need those jobs.
AZ for RFK Jr⚔️🇺🇸
@rfk_jr_ftw
·
407d
@marwilliamson Those are jobs that should be held by citizens imo

I find the argument that needing cheap labor for unattractive jobs justifies illegal behavior to be just weird and dumb.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
407d
To those of you excited by the idea of mass deportations that go way beyond the point of removing criminals, I ask:

Do the millions of busboys and dishwashers and gardeners and day care workers and housekeepers and janitors and street cleaners and sanitation workers and…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of employment and immigration, specifically addressing the availability of jobs for American citizens versus immigrants. The tone is assertive, suggesting disagreement with the notion that there is competition for certain jobs.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the concern about job competition, which could be seen as dismissive of others' perspectives.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the concern without further explanation or engagement. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply negates the previous point without providing a rationale or engaging in further discussion. [-1]