The statement critiques government spending on a specific project, suggesting it is not a good use of taxpayer money. The tone is critical and implies disapproval of the funding decision.
- The statement does not directly harm, but the context and framing could perpetuate stigma against certain groups. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement may not respect the dignity of the individuals involved by using potentially stigmatizing language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a negative light without context. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or alternative solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.