Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the effectiveness of protestors in challenging political policies, specifically those of Netanyahu, and critiques the actions of college students in a protest context. The tone is dismissive and critical, suggesting that the protestors' efforts are futile compared to the actions of a journalist, Barak Ravid.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the efforts of protestors and implies their actions are worthless, which could be seen as harmful and discouraging. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does dismiss the dignity of the protestors by belittling their efforts. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it resorts to a dismissive tone and personal attacks on the protestors' intelligence and effectiveness. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.