In reply to:
Nenad Markovic
@NIONenad
·
403d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
403d
The statement is a part of a conversation that engages with public discourse, as it involves a discussion about the composition of a political administration and its implications for the working class, which is a public issue. The reply 'Why though?' seeks clarification or further explanation, indicating an interest in understanding the reasoning behind the agreement with a political figure.
- The statement 'Why though?' is neutral and seeks to promote understanding by asking for clarification, which aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a simple inquiry that could lead to constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.