In reply to:
alexanichadhain
@alexanichadhain
·
402d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
402d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the geopolitical situation involving the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine, and the potential impact of political leadership changes. It reflects on the actions of current and former U.S. presidents in relation to international conflict.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could be seen as speculative and potentially misleading without evidence.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on political maneuvering rather than humanitarian aspects. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it speculates on future events without engaging with differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it speculates on political outcomes without offering solutions or constructive insights. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible by avoiding speculative claims without evidence.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.