Marianne Williamson

The statement by @Leesworld561 engages in a public discourse about climate change, responding to a conversation that debates the significance and human influence on climate change. The tone is assertive, aiming to counter the idea that human influence on climate is 'insane' by suggesting that the majority of scientists support the notion of human impact on climate change.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding by referencing scientific consensus, which can foster empathy and compassion for the issue of climate change. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in dialogue by countering an argument without resorting to personal attacks, though it could be more constructive by providing evidence or further explanation.
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly engage in a significant public issue. [+1]